Reply To: “12 Angry Men” (Year 2)

[Anonymous]

I think jury 4 is worth mentioning. He gave the impression of a person basing his opinion on facts. He did not show conformism towards the group. We meet him as a juror who is interested in evidence and testimonies of witnesses. When the testimony of a woman who allegedly saw the murder was logically and sensibly undermined, he changed his mind because he believed that the accused was not guilty.